Physician Views - Taking a post-ASCO pulse on the PD-L1 biomarker debate in non-small-cell lung cancer

Physician Views - Taking a post-ASCO pulse on the PD-L1 biomarker debate in non-small-cell lung cancer

Code: FW-20150601 | Published: Jun-2015 | Pages: - | FirstWord
Price :

* Required Fields



The data presented at this years ASCO annual meeting, which has subsequently fuelled the most debate, is likely that from Bristol-Myers Squibbs Checkmate-057 study, assessing its PD-1 inhibitor Opdivo for the treatment of second-line non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Results from the Checkmate-057 study illustrated that Opdivo was associated with a 27-percent reduction in the risk of progression or death compared to docetaxel, positioning Bristol-Myers Squibbs product as the first PD-1 inhibitor to show a significant improvement in overall survival in a Phase III trial in non-squamous NSCLC compared with the current standard of care.

A subsequent analysis of survival based on PD-L1 expression demonstrated that this benefit was driven, however, by those patients who had pre-specified PD-L1 expression levels of 10 percent or more. Investors sent Bristol-Myers Squibbs share price down as a result, given a consensus-supported view that Opdivo was likely to work in all non-squamous NSCLC patients, irrespective of PD-L1 status (FirstWord Lists: Best selling cancer drugs - 2014 and 2020).

An earlier study - Checkmate-017, used to support approval of Opdivo in second-line squamous NSCLC - had supported this view and appeared to validate Bristol-Myers Squibbs status as a "reluctant adopter of PD-L1 testing" in the advanced lung cancer indication, noted Bernstein analyst Tim Anderson. The consequences of these unexpected data from Checkmate-057 are a potential opportunity for rival players Roche and Merck & Co. to be more competitive in second-line lung cancer and the strength of Bristol-Myers Squibbs biomarker capabilities (ViewPoints: Opdivo disappoints in lung cancer - Bristol-Myers Squibbs pain could be Merck & Co., Roches gain).

Clinical and regulatory implications stemming from the PD-L1 as a biomarker debate will increasingly converge in the coming months, based on submission of Opdivo for approval in non-squamous NSCLC based on the Checkmate-057 data, confirmation that Mercks Keytruda has been accepted for priority review (based on data in PD-L1 positive patients, but with management taking up the potential for a broad label) and with Roche expected to file its PD-L1 inhibitor in advanced lung cancer in late 2015/early 2016.

With these factors in mind, Anderson wrote in a note to investors this week "it seems to us that this matter will be headed to an FDA advisory committee at some point soon. The agency would want to discuss the role of PD-L1 testing both in product labels and in clinical practice, within the limits of the clinical trial data it currently has. Clearly, the biomarker situation is fluid, but increasingly there seems to be concordance among different companies findings."

On the back of the Checkmate-057 data presented at ASCO, and fuelled by increasing debate around the validity of PD-L1 as a biomarker in the sizeable market for advanced NSCLC, we are polling US and EU5 oncologists this week with the following questions

- Based on data from the Checkmate-057 study presented at ASCO (, do you think Opdivo should be approved with a broad label for the treatment of all second-line non-squamous NSCLC patients - i.e. PD-L1 expressers and non-expressers?

- Assuming a broad label is approved, how would you expect to use Opdivo in PD-L1 non-expressing patients?

- If competing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors reach the market for the treatment of second-line NSCLC with labelling restricted to PD-L1 expressers (given selection by biomarker for pivotal stage study enrolment), would you likely use these products in non-expressing patients also?

- Do you think that approval of subsequent therapies labelled specifically for PD-L1 expressing, second-line NSCLC patients - and launched with companion diagnostics - would support more proactive patient stratification on your part and the use of these treatments more frequently in PD-L1 expressing patients (i.e. do you expect more stratification of this indication over time)?

- Based on you reading of current data, how confident are you in the use of PD-L1 as an effective biomarker in lung cancer? Confused with current discussion around PD-L1

Report Format

Following are different modes of Licenses.

a. Single User License:
This license allows only one person to use the report. This person can use the report on any computer and may take print outs of the report but must take care of not sharing the report (or any information contained therein) with any other individual or people. Unless you purchase a Site License or a Global Site License, a Single User License must be purchased for every single person that wishes to use the report within the same enterprise.

b. Single Site License:
This license allows unlimited users to use the report within one company location, e.g. a regional office. These users can use the report on any computer and may take print outs of the report but must take care of not sharing the report (or any information contained therein) with any other individual or people.

c. Global Site License:
A Global Site License (or Enterprise wide Site License or Global License) is a license granted to original purchaser, who can share a report with other employees and authorized Users of the same organization.

Quick Help

1. How do you deliver the reports?
The delivery of reports is depends on format & mode of license of report(s). Following are different kinds of formats of report(s) and their delivery options :

a. Electronic Format – Through email from Publisher
Report will be sent to your username email address in PDF, Excel, PowerPoint or any other electronic / softcopy format by publisher.
Delivery Time: 12 to 48 hours [depending on time difference or occurrences of national holidays]

b. Hard Copy or Printed Format or CD-Rom – Through Mail or Courier from Publisher
Report will be sent through mail / courier delivery to your shipping address by publisher.
Delivery Time: Less than, few weeks [depending on time difference or occurrences of national holidays]

2. How can I make payment for publications I purchase?
You could be able to make the payment, in following ways:

a. Online Secure Payment through Credit Card Payment : We accept Visa, Master, AMEX Cards & CCAvenue
b. Transfer of fund to our bank account via Bank transfer or Wire transfer
c. Payment via DD or Cheque
d. Paypal

3. Is it safe to use my credit card on MarketinfoResearch?
Your personal information and online tranaction on Marketinfo Research is secure, private, and tamper-proof. All credit card payments are processed through secure and trusted payment gateways.

If you have a more question about our publications please see our FAQs section or contact us now at


There are no reports matching the selection.

Browse similar reports by category:
Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare

Our Clients